<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Innovation for the Common Good &#124; Collective Invention Inc. &#187; sustainability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innovationforthecommongood.com/archives/tag/sustainability/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innovationforthecommongood.com</link>
	<description>Innovation for the Common Good Blog by Collective Invention Inc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The S Word</title>
		<link>http://innovationforthecommongood.com/archives/385</link>
		<comments>http://innovationforthecommongood.com/archives/385#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clark Kellogg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clark Kellogg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationforthecommongood.com/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to find a person who is against sustainability. I can think of only two people I know. Sustainability is in the same league as Motherhood and Apple Pie. But sustainability’s approval rating nosedives in most conversations approximately 30 seconds after it starts. That’s usually the time when the gauzy notion of sustainability inevitably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s hard to find a person who is against sustainability. I can think of only two people I know. Sustainability is in the same league as Motherhood and Apple Pie. But sustainability’s approval rating nosedives in most conversations approximately 30 seconds after it starts. That’s usually the time when the gauzy notion of sustainability inevitably gives way to defining the term (30 point approval rating drop) or actually doing something about it (free fall).</p>
<p>What’s going on here? For one, humans are good at using our big brains to know a lot. But it doesn’t always translate into doing a lot. Second, we are on sustainability overwhelm. Staying current is like drinking from a fire hose – everyday.  And that’s hard to swallow.  Third, amid this explosive growth in knowledge and information the very meaning of sustainability has been diluted to the point of meaning just about anything, and thus meaning nothing.</p>
<p>We all support motherhood, apple pie and sustainability. We know what the first two mean and we know how to create them. Not so for sustainability. Even the Brundtland Commission’s definition – development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs  – is difficult to apply to the here-and-now of one’s daily life. Paper or plastic?</p>
<p>Without an explicit shared agreement about the meaning of sustainability even the well-informed and well meaning among us cannot make much progress. Indeed, this lack of clarity enables avoiding the most neglected problem in sustainable design today: time. There are many projections about when catastrophic environmental events will take place (GHG, ice shelf melting, sea-level rise, water wars). It’s hard to know how accurate they are and it doesn’t matter. The plain fact is that we don’t have time to wait and find out if the projections are correct. What matters is taking smart bold steps now because here’s what we do know: the longer it takes to start meaningful healing of the earth, the less likely we are to have a viable future. In short, we don’t have time to waste.</p>
<p>Is there any hope? Yes, and its not false hope. Design – and design thinking – as a set of solution-seeking tools is spreading to every corner of the world. Indeed, we are all designers now and optimism is an onboard skill of every designer everywhere (sustainable or otherwise).  More importantly, healing the earth is igniting the largest movement of human energy in the history of the planet. It is a movement without precedent; amorphous, unorganized, instinctive, and blessedly uncontrollable. Literally billions of people are on the job. It is already the single largest public works project ever.</p>
<p>In the end, if we can get as good at creating sustainability as we are at creating motherhood and apple pie we could find ourselves being happy, well fed and living long, balanced lives. Cloth or disposable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://innovationforthecommongood.com/archives/385/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experiencing Life, 2050</title>
		<link>http://innovationforthecommongood.com/archives/310</link>
		<comments>http://innovationforthecommongood.com/archives/310#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erika Gregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collective Invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erika Gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experience Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2050]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[museum of unintended consequences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wbcsd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world business council on sustainable development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationforthecommongood.com/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One might reasonably be skeptical that executives from 30 of the world&#8217;s largest corporations, mostly strangers to one another, would be willing to suspend disbelief and assume the identity of a person living in the year 2050. First online, then in global teleconferences followed by a face-to-face work session. I was, to be honest, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might reasonably be skeptical that executives from 30 of the world&#8217;s largest corporations, mostly strangers to one another, would be willing to suspend disbelief and assume the identity of a person living in the year 2050. First online, then in global teleconferences followed by a face-to-face work session.</p>
<p>I was, to be honest, a little skeptical myself.</p>
<p>But that is exactly what happened when we facilitated a recent experience for the World Business Council on Sustainable Development (<a title="WBCSD" href="http://www.wbcsd.org">WBCSD</a>) in order to understand the values and behaviors that will shape consumers of the future. To set the stage, we created an online world rich in detail (drawn from our own primary research and WBCSD&#8217;s extensive resources) about how people who care about sustainability will eat, play, learn, work, entertain themselves, communicate and get from place to place in the year 2050.</p>
<p>Because the project&#8217;s participants are part of a global consortium of companies who share a commitment to environmental sustainability, those members in our event were executives responsible either for marketing or for the sustainability agenda per se in their organizations. They were highly motivated to understand the lifestyles of the sustainable consumer 10, 20, 30 and 40 years in the future. To make this happen as viscerally as possible, we created an online platform that let them walk in the shoes of  60 fictional consumers, interacting with others along the way, before bringing the group together in a face-to-face collaboration in the UK.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">* * * * *</p>
<p>At another level, I&#8217;m not surprised at all that people jumped in so earnestly. Clients of all kinds have proven quite willing to engage in imaginative processes as long as they see a substantive link to their &#8220;real&#8221; strategic work. The precept that <em>transformative experiences lead to transformative ideas</em> is born out of a series of experiences over the last 15 years, beginning with the design of the Museum of Unintended Consequences for Global Business Network (<a title="GBN" href="http://www.gbn.com">GBN</a>) in which we took 150 business leaders through an audio tour of ideas and products that have led to unanticipated outcomes, including plate glass, the birth control pill, and, finally, the telescope. In the last gallery each visitor found himself alone, enrobed by a twinkling night sky, listening to Galileo talk about what his contraption had taught him about the cosmos. The final act was for each person to answer (on a 3&#215;5 card) this question: &#8220;how did you come to be sitting here today?&#8221;</p>
<p>I have kept those cards for over a decade because the responses we received were extraordinary. They wove together lives and careers, events planned and unplanned, epiphanies that could only have resulted from being asked <em>this</em> question at <em>this</em> moment after <em>this</em> particular experience. And they showed me that whatever professional personas we adopt, we are all looking for ways to make meaning out of the actions we take, the experiences we have, and the ways in which we wield our power in the world. As one CEO said in a different context: &#8220;what people don&#8217;t understand is that, if you want me to take risks that affect thousands of people, I have to be <em>moved</em> first. It&#8217;s not just an intellectual decision.&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">* * * * *</p>
<p>After a week of working online with the WBCSD participants, we met them all in Weybridge, Surrey, the UK, for a day and a half. In that setting we focused on exactly the kinds of things that CEO was talking about: the motivators, influencers and behaviors that will affect decisions in the future, moving people to make&#8211;we all hope&#8211;decisions that are both ethical and environmentally conscious. Our bet is that by sharing in this sort of experiential process, the companies involved will similarly be moved to risk building the products and services that will support the best intentions of consumers&#8211;now <em>and</em> several decades hence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://innovationforthecommongood.com/archives/310/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
